![]() ![]() But in your experience what would you would have liked to know before taking up FoG? Any tips? ![]() I happen to be a fan of large armies, so FoG sounds good. 50KDP!!! wrote: So what about the combat mechanism? Is one better than the other, Saga and FoG that is. The games have very different scopes, as well as investment levels in time and money. I don't yet have any Dark Ages Armies, but things like Saxons, or Vikings are roughly equivalent in numbers to the Carthaginians or Gauls. My Carthaginians have about 400 figures in their army. The Gauls have about 500 figures in the army. My Republican Romans (I think they call them "Middle Republican") have about 320 figures in the army. Saga deals with individually based troops, of about 12 - 50 men on each side.įoG deals with element based troops, with about 60 - 200 elements in an army (or 200 - 500 figures per side, depending). Though if I am correct (I may very well not be) Saga and FoG handle very different numbers of troops. ![]() NickP wrote: Have you taken a look at SAGA? It covers the same periods, is very hot right now and incredibly easy for beginners to pick up, yet takes a lot of skill to master.Ĭonversely, I don't hear a lot of buzz about Field of Glory these days. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |